this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
333 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

49968 readers
1196 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
333
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by FrostBlazer@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

Wanting to help third parties get off the ground local to you and help progressives win more in your state? Join the Equal Vote Coalition and we can organize to help make a difference.

Want to start a grassroots initiative local to you specifically? Find out more here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We’re talking about electing representatives to govern our country, not picking what movie a few people want to go watch.

Yes, so whoever has the most votes should win in each election for each position, because the majority of people want that person for that job

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s a great argument in favor of an alternative voting system. Because we both agree that the most votes should win for each representative. Hence the added benefit of having the two rounds of voting since those additional vote preferences are taken into consideration. Through of one these alternative voting systems, we can truly say that the majority of people wanted that person for the job rather.

It’s also a great argument for score voting as well since that is only one round of voting, but you can give a score for each candidate and the candidate with the highest total score wins.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because we both agree that the most votes should win for each representative.

No, you came up with a bunch of crap that overcomplicates it and I want to keep it simple.

what I want is for the person with the most votes to win. What you want is not that

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

How is it crap and how does this overcomplicate any of it?

The person with the most votes does win under other voting systems I have brought up. What I want is exactly that. I my second example for instance person C has 29 votes compared to person A’s 24 votes, how is that not person C having the most votes and winning?

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How is it crap and how does this overcomplicate any of it?

you're adding too many steps, too many oppurtunities for fuckery to happen

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

Then go for the option where all the voting happens at one step based on preference. If you still want a best of two you can have the primary election earlier in the year with a score vote tally, and the two candidates that have the highest scores votes from that process then go into a head to head FPTP style for the general election.

For the record both Alaska and Maine are currently using an Alternative Voting system as well as many countries in Europe. Australia also uses an Alternative Voting system. So it can be done successfully in many countries without issue.