this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
155 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
3010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Intel Corp. is poised to announce plans this week to cut more than 20% of its staff, aiming to eliminate bureaucracy at the struggling chipmaker, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 32 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Nothing at all to do with the tariffs, I'm sure.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, Intel has been up shit creek for a while now. No one big wants to use Intel’s fabs because they’re afraid that Intel’s design team will copy their homework.

Vertical integration has fucked Intel. TSMC’s fabs get all the important contracts from Nvidia, Apple, etc. And the massive client volume allows them to accelerate the evolution of their fab tech.

Intel needs to break their chip design business and fab into two separate businesses, otherwise it’s a continuation of the death march.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

AMD did that, but Global Foundry doesn't do that well, at least compared to TSMC. Also Intel was going strong with their fabs until AMD started building better chips architecture wise. I'm just saying that splitting might not work.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 hours ago

The Global Foundries split was probably a way to get AMD out of the hyper-capital-intensive fab business. And without a tier-1 customer, Global had less reason to pursue smaller nodes.

Intel has that national-champion thing to keep it afloat. I can imagine there are defence contracts that will never go to a "TSMC Arizona Division" and they'll pay whatever it takes to keep that going.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah for a long time there Intel was way ahead of the fabless AMD. Back then people were saying it was a mistake for AMD to split the fab business.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

No one wants to use their fabs because they're bad!

(Not awful, but not cutting edge really any more)

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 hours ago

They've been struggling a lot recently, but this stuff with the tarrifs cantve made it any easier for them.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

A lot of their chips are fab'd in the US and Israel and Germany and others though. It's weird that nobody has mentioned all their US fabs. The new ones coming up in Ohio shortly (construction has been going already) will be two next-gen fab plants.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 10 hours ago

Suffering decades of imbeciles executive "leadership"

They spent the R&D budgets on stock buy backs and now rely on federal government to pitch in for their capex.