Technology

38571 readers

355 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

112

Petition: Bring the Affinity Suite to Linux - Please sign it! (www.change.org)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Novocirab@feddit.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We are currently seeing a huge increase in people considering to install Linux because of the actions of both Microsoft and the autocratic U.S. government. Among these people are many who rely on creative software by Adobe or other companies, for which there is no comparable alternative with Linux support. If we can convince Affinity to provide Linux support for their programs (Designer, Photo, Publisher), a lot more people will likely ditch Windows, and a lot of people who are already using Linux will get easy access to powerful (one-time payment) creative software.

#AffinityOnLinux

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Developers make software because they want to, or because they are paid to.

Consumers can use free software because it fits their needs, or they can pay for software if the free options don't suffice.

Consumer demand for paid software drives paid software development.

You claim to be an open source developer, cool. There are people who are not developers who can't contribute code but still want software. Sometimes that software needs to be paid because some free options aren't "there" yet. Yes they could pay or donate to open source developers, but they can also tell a company they want to pay for linux software which is what this thread is about, in a community that isn't focused on open source software

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Your comment made me realize I'm (and I'm sure I'm not alone) sort of the problem with Linux.

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love the massive community of tools and programs out there like free open source software. But I've never actually bought anything for a Linux system with one exception: Debian in a box, on a CD for like, $15.

Buuuut, I have bought FOSS, games, and utilities for Mac and Windows that started as Linux apps and work on my new system.

I guess there is a mindset of get something free to suffice with Linux systems rather than pay for polished apps, and I totally get that thrill, but is there business to be made in this market, or a sunk cost at the end of the year.

I'd really like to see the app, and it takes bold risks to populate this platform, and there's certainly pushback, but that's also what separates Linux from windows. No point in having a machine if there are gaps in workflow or utility.