this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
157 points (94.4% liked)

Games

16800 readers
784 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I dont understand how is this still such a big issue in 2023. Years ago even Pathfinder Kingmaker figured out a better way of doing it (shared party inventory and combined total weight with gradual penalties), why is nobody just copying or improving on that? Or just remove the limitation whatsoever if the game is not about it, like would the CRPG experience really be diminished if we didn't have to worry about constant looting and inventory management?

Even the RL DMs know better than to pester their players about it, just keep it within some reasonable common sense limits.

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BG3 like DOS2 doesn't have shared inventories because they want multiplayer situations to allow for stuffing around etc

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It's an UI issue, not a gameplay one. If it's really that important to have separate inventory while exploring, fine - but then make it a shared, easy to manage, infinite stash once you're back at your base or at some other meaningful checkpoint.

Im just tired of pointless inventory management. I just want to play the game.

Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous really spoiled us with its carry weight when half your party got pets. The inventory in BG3 is bad, but the fact it's so easy to reach the carry limit only makes it worse.

I would much rather have an auto-loot mechanic, like hire an NPC to loot for you and only bring the stuff you care about. That way it still feels realistic, but you don't actually need to deal with loot all that much and you get most of the benefit. So you'll just grab the stuff you think is useful, then the rest gets sold eventually.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've managed to talk most of my DMs into a graduated scale of bags of holding. The cheapest is only 100gp, but it only weighs 5 pounds, and only holds 25 or 30. Something like that. It's been years.

It made it so we all had an appropriate bag of holding by level 2, and we just upgraded as we ~~plundered and looted the countryside~~ "aided the poor villagers."