this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
1127 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

2503 readers
1489 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Via Xcancel)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I like the artwork, I approve of the message, and this gave me a chuckle.

But c'mon, like, it's against the rules. If you are annoyed by AI art being submitted to human art contests, you should be annoyed by this too.

The first time I read about AI art being submitted to a human contest and winning, I thought, "how drôle." Of course, now I see it violates the spirit of competition. AI art should have its own category -- and that doesn't just go one way. Like it or not, AI is a tool and if some people want to explore how to use it to make good content, let's let them do that in peace. Maybe it will become fractionally less shitty.

[–] scintilla@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Actually I don't have to be ok with anyone contributing to the burning down of the planet. I feel like adults should have a better understanding of morality than simply "its against the rules and is therefore wrong".

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 2 days ago

I think most people don't really develop moral reasoning past "I don't want to get punished" or, if you're lucky, "it's against the rules."

[–] renzev@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No man what are you doing! We already used the "well actually it's bad because uhhh climate change" argument against cryptocurrencies, you can't double-dip like! When you hate on AI you're supposed to use the "but it's plagiarism" argument! Everyone knows that!

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OK then

  1. It is bad for the climate
  2. Its plagiarism
  3. We are literally putting our means of expressing ourselves into the hands of a few people. So once they just decide that cats are now not allowed, no one will be able to create memes about cats
  4. You are fueling a machine that google is selling to the genocide in Gaza.
  5. You will never be able to create new things. Since an AI only has relatively few nodes that are random (so it can output different things when given the same input) let's say about 10% of your picture is actually new, and the rest plagiarised. You could just input that again and make it more random, but inputting something AI generated into an AI just makes it shit itself, it will not be „random” like an artist thinks about making a new way of expressing themselves”,but random as in „let's just expose a drive to extreme radiation and see what the data looks like after 1000 bitflips
  6. The data collection. If a normal human collected that much data about me I could just sue them for stalking
[–] renzev@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just run your AI models locally? Problem solved lol.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

So you want to buy me and every about like 10 million people a server that can run a halfway good LLM Model and pay the electric bills?

Also it dosent change any point except 2

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's actually quite a few models that can run easily on a mid-range gaming computer (yes even for image generation, and yes they can run reasonably well) which...that same energy would probably be consumed by gaming so not really a huge difference.

Microsoft even just released an open weights LLM that runs entirely on CPU that is comparable to the big hosted ones people are paying for

Edit: just saw what community I'm in, so my comment was probably not appropriate for the community

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The electric bills would not be high (per person) jsyk. It'd be comparable to playing a video game when in use.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Generated art isn't art. Generative AI artists don't exist. Calling it a tool implies it helps in the execution of a task when all it actually does is shit out slop based on stolen training data.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

You should try the AI Art Turing Test! 50 "art" pieces, you have to decide whether they were human or AI. I got about 70% when I did this.