this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
1124 points (94.4% liked)
People Twitter
6829 readers
525 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, to be fair, what would such evidence look like? Would you like to see secret documents (conveniently found in a rich banker's living room) that detail that single-family homes get easier credit benefits so that more people buy them? I'm afraid that kind of proof will be difficult to get hold of, if the banks or whoever might be behind it don't show it to us out of their own free will.
Who would look for such evidence? Who can pay for a search after that evidence? The banks won't investigate themselves and find that they manipulate people.
As such, it is directly natural that there is no proof. That doesn't automatically make it wrong though, just without proof. The question is: is it likely? is it perceivable? is it consistent?