this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
521 points (79.6% liked)

Memes

49983 readers
1590 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cool agitprop posters like what OP posted rarely give you a particularly nuanced perspective due to their limited space. The intended effect is to spark conversation, not to beam Marxism into the heads of anyone who sees it.

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

rip marxists, the one type they make a meme with fewer than 100 words and people still complain :0

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For real... 🫠

If I write an essay, people don't genuinely read it, if I write short responses I either over-simplify or manage to raise more questions than I answer... at least, it feels that way sometimes, lol

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read them. I have learned a lot on Lemmy.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I appreciate it! I know there are people who do, some of them send me DMs or reply directly to me so it all justifies the efforts I do, I just wish the human brain worked better with direct argumentation than it does when viewing a debate from the outside. Ie, I wish those I carefully spend time writing for took it to heart more than onlookers tend to, but the net result is still positive so I keep with it.

Thanks again!

[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your comments are consistently high quality and there's plenty of people reading without engaging who will be influenced in small but meaningful ways. You're planting good seeds.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Thank you, I appreciate it! I do it more for others than the people I directly interact with, who have largely made up their mind already. That's generally my strategy, people looking to argue online aren't going to change their minds, they see it as a "win/lose" situation. Instead, I focus on refutation of absurd claims and well-sourced information more for onlookers to engage with. I really like Nia Frome's articles on Red Sails called Marketing Socialism and On Dialectics, Or How to Defeat Enemies. They really help shape how I engage with others online, decisive and sharp refutation is very useful for onlookers to see.

For more fun articles on why people believe what they do, I'm a big fan of Roderic Day's "Brainwashing" and Masses, Elites, and Rebels: The Theory of "Brainwashing." Those help dramatically with seeing that, really, there's little convincing others directly in online debate, but there is hope for others whose material conditions have opened them up to new ideas to see and engage with more information they are curious about.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It reminds me of how people hated on “defund the police” messaging. I got into an argument with someone that focused on the phrase alone and was completely uninterested in a genuine discussion about what it means. Like what do they expect? An entire novel written on a poster or a tweet to appease them? The point is to kick the conversation off, not spoon-feed you.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Yep, you hit the nail on the head! Effective agitprop sparks conversations and forces engagement, not just people immediately dismissing it or accepting it before going on with their days.