this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
152 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23678 readers
195 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 59 points 2 days ago (6 children)

After construction of the experimental reactor started in 2018, most of the scientists involved in the project abandoned their holidays – they worked day and night, and some stayed on site for more than 300 days in a year.

That's not ideal

[–] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not that I'd ever support throwing your work-life balance into the meatgrinder like that, but if I had a job trying to create one of the best potential options for long-term power production while the world was setting itself on fire from fossil fuels I might consider 50 hour work weeks for a bit too.

Yep. I'd do it in a heartbeat. These folks are heroes.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

create one of the best potential options for long-term power production

I disagree about this (you don't solve the substantive short and medium term problems of nuclear) but even if it was a wonder technology that was cheaper, faster to deploy and simpler than anything else, having a 30 year timeframe to mass commercial roll out means it won't really make a difference

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

That said, if anyone could make a cheap thorium SMR that could be mass produced, it'll be China

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My instinct is, "please don't allow sleep deprived people to operate an experimental nuclear reactor, even if they want to."

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago

that's how you get the eldrich, we built it but we don't understand it reactors out of science fiction

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seems like might be a case of them really wanting to see it work. Most jobs don't really have any meaning beyond a paycheck, but this is a rare case of work being genuinely meaningful and interesting.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Presenteeism is a sickness and if I were Chinese Stalin, I'd be sending them home. It burns out people in academia very quick and it's not like Chinese has a lack of young graduates to put on projects like these

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I certainly agree that working this hard is not healthy as a rule.

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

Well meaningful is a bit of an understatement.

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally sounds like by choice by the wording

[–] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, honestly there is a big difference between being forced to work long hours by a corporation and choosing to work long hours because you are passionate about something, or in a "flow state," or you feel like you have a real stake in the outcome of the project. I am sure during the Space Race there were scientists on both sides pulling insane hours, driven largely by national patriotic pride, which might also be at play here. I don't think there's anything wrong with workers working for long hours as long as 1) it is voluntary, 2) it is safe both physically and mentally, and 3) it is temporary, for only a year or a few years, with an enforced return to a 40-hour work week at some cutoff point.

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You forgot to mention job security

Imagine working super hard, burning out for a little bit, then getting fired for low performance

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

burning out for a little bit

There's no such thing as "burning out for a little bit" though. Burn out takes about 4 years to recover from.

[–] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's stupid but this is the norm around the world. At my plant, which is not a nuclear plant, most of the engineers and workers can't take a leave and are always "on call" (even though their contract is not an on call contract) until they can get a break once in around 1.5 years because we are technically understaffed. And this isn't even a meaningful plant, if it goes down nothing really happens.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I did see something about how a lot of the hydro plants in the US are becoming woeful understaffed because there is no appetite to hire staff and very few people have the appropriate training anyway

[–] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They can definitely hire staff, especially in the US of all places there is no shortage of promising engineers. Very few people get hired to these kinds of plants fully trained, most pick up 90% of their skills on the job. It's just a long process. The real reason, at least for our plant (a plant that has already returned all its investment dividends tenfold, passed its calculated lifespan, and is now just a money printing machine), is that there are chiefly 2 ways (3 in our country, but this isn't about that) that the plant becomes more economical to keep running: process improvements or reduction of labour costs. The sacrifice first comes for maintenance staff, overworking them, then for all other disciplines depending on whats allowed to be gutted by law. Engineers are actually making out in a relatively "favourable" position, since they can directly contribute to process improvements - the company has fewer incentives to let them go. This situation ends in there being a settled number of so-and-so engineers, which is "understaffed" according to your and mine definitions, but is the perfect amount for the line-go-up number-crunchers.

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Guessing you're Russian based on the handle but this was also a thing in the Soviet union even in the 30s, there were cases of people wanting to work too much that their boss had to force them to take time off. It just lowers your productivity in the long run

[–] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

Trust me our guys aren't raring to work at all. Most of them aren't citizens and their residency status and their family's lifestyle depend on them being able to hold this job, so they feel obligated to do this. Just classic capitalism things. Also, the plant is not in Russia.

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its actually pretty common in China for employers to provide housing accomodations to their employees. So my guess is they had some sort of apartment complex on site that people were using. They werent like sleeping in their offices.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not a very large complex - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TMSR-LF1

The site is about an hour and a half away from the nearest urbanised area

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Being an hour and a half away actually makes it make even more sense theyd sleep there to avoid a commute.

My guess is the top right building is housing. You have 2 gate houses, one just to the main building and one to that side building. Would make sense if researchers were living in that side building that there would be visitors or maybe even family living with them there that they would want the extra gate for. Since they wouldnt be allowed inside the main building.