this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
517 points (93.6% liked)

Science Memes

14653 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 117 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

He was found guilty of medical malpractice after gene editing babies by treating their embryos with CRISPR/Cas9. He claims that he was trying to make them resistant to HIV, and that medical ethics are preventing cures from being discovered, but his critics say that we know CRISPR is too unreliable to use on a genome the size of a human's, and is more likely to introduce dangerous mutations than apply the intended change, hence why no one else has done this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He_Jiankui

[–] VolumetricShitCompressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So why is he allowed to work in this field again? Seems wild

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

His assistants weren't though

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Making them resistant to HIV. How does he test it whether they actually are...?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Sequence them; he was bashing in a gene that we already know conveys HIV resistance (but not complete immunity), the ∆32 mutation. If sequencing shows that the babies have the mutation, and also don't have any other negative mutations as a result of the experiment, then it was successful.

That 'and also' is the hard one to be sure about.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I need a human baby" is a very difficult sentence to start a conversation with. I don't blame him for avoiding that awkward proposal.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better to ask forgiveness than permission!

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

The ethics board does not approve the message.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ok, but, does it really not work, or like, it's just that you would have to run it in a batch and kill the bad cells, which could be unethical on human embryos?

Like, could we grow legs on a lungfish (which Google says has a larger genome than humans) using CRISPR-cas9 if we did not care about botched embryos?

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You'd need to test every cell in the embryo to be sure none of them had off-target mutations, and DNA sequencing doesn't leave the cell alive, so you can't prove it worked without killing the embryo. He tested some of the cells and discarded embryos where those cells were damaged, but there's no way to know if the untested cells in the embryos were fine, and given what we know about the reliability, it's more likely that there are problems than not.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

yea he was the chinese dude, doing unsanctioned/unethical sciences, which probably dint work nor his paper would be published anyways.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 56 points 1 month ago

A scientist who has served time in prison for editing human genetics. It was with the intention of combatting HIV, but it seems to have been done with little to no regard for medical ethics, including misleading the parents of the babies involved and apparently putting them on the hook for the costs of the experiments if they pulled out

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He illegally modifyied a couple embryos in a way he claimed would make them resistant to certain diseases and subsequently artificially inseminating them (with consent).

He was sentenced to 3(?) years in prison by China and lost his job.

Not sure where he's working now or what kind of research.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

Well the obvious follow up is, clearly, cat girls.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Legendary mad scientist. Does stuff that's obviously unethical but not illegal (yet), gets caught, the authorities patch the law, and then he moves on to new mad science. Once went to jail for editing a baby's genome.