this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4001 readers
262 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Adopting an AR because it's the lightest, most ergonomic, and most mature fighting rifle in the world. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Adopting an AR because it's a commercial-off-the-shelf product and developing your own rifle is expensive. (☞゚ヮ゚)☞

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

You don't use bullpups because they're expensive, I don't use bullpups because how am I going to attach all my gadgets to it with all this plastic in the way?

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I see your light, ergonomic, mature, inexpensive rifle design and raise you a weird obsession with developing new bullpup designs for some reason ~~ every military apparently

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think bullpups have a lot going for them and their disadvantages don't matter too much in an infantry context.

The FAMAS died because St. Etienne Arsenal died. The L85 is about to die because Enfield died. The Tavor is dying because ~~Israel gets free M4's from the US~~.

It all seems to have to do with economics rather than the performance of the AR or lack thereof of a bullpup.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

FAMAS my love 😭