Asking for a women-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less men. If you're implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I'd love to show you the Grey's Anatomy sub.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

i mean, i don't see anything necessarily wrong with it though.

It's like making a linux specific lemmy instance, or an anarchist focused lemmy instance (the one im on)

it might go against the principles of lemmy, but there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Neigh, Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all the world.

I am species blind. Asking for a species-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less horses. If you're implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I'd love to show you equestrian sports.

There is literally nothing different between any species, gender, or even a rock. Women, Men. Heck 1 + 1 = 3. Everything is exactly the same. It's a soup of protons. It's all the same!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think there are differences in the interests of both. Can you explain your argument here, without super obscure references?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We just shouldn't consider either gender's interests as stereotypes. Also, if a community becomes one or the other "centric", then on some level, it's exclusionary.

[–] Tonuka@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

You know that just because gender is a social construct, it doesn't mean we should or even can just ignore it? You took step one on the awareness ladder but stopped before step two