this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13785 readers
877 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

9-0 isn't all that surprising considering the subject matter, tbh the worst I was expecting out of the supreme court on this case was 8-1 maybe 7-2. Judges typically don't like when government agents/agencies blatantly or accidentally fuck someone over, then do nothing to remedy it, unless it involves cops.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

unless it involves cops.

This does involve cops...

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

To us yes, to them it's a government agency extreme cock up. Which is entirely different to police qualified immunity, as government agencies aren't exactly given the same thing per say.

[–] CTHlurker@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Judges who are picked by the Federalist Society also don't tend to be big fans of the various government agencies, even if they are cop-adjacent