this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
854 points (99.3% liked)

World News

45657 readers
2371 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This is bad for Canada. US might try to take ours - by force.

[–] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Canada and Greenland should also institute export licensing rules on critical minerals too

[–] MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’m truly afraid that might be one of their hopes.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Mines in Canada are privately owned. I’d be down for nationalizing them. To protect them.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Doesn't the US have plenty of these materials, it's just too expensive to mine it because of environmental protection legislation, wages, energy costs, missing infrastructure for it and so on? This wouldn't change in Canada/Greenland.

[–] Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It would... if the annexed territories became a special economic zone where, magically, slavery was made completely legal.
For an example what might be yet to come, you could take a look at the horrifying history of the construction of the White Sea-Baltic Canal which happened in a similarly hostile environment.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Of course, you are theoretically completely right. But Greenland has absolutely 0 infrastructure, not even basics like roads between places, and almost no people, and Canada would resist so powerfully (they have nuclear weapons) that it's also completely unrealistic.