Technology

68348 readers

3313 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

812

Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 day ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

200 comments fedilink hide all child comments

US experts who work in artificial intelligence fields seem to have a much rosier outlook on AI than the rest of us.

In a survey comparing views of a nationally representative sample (5,410) of the general public to a sample of 1,013 AI experts, the Pew Research Center found that "experts are far more positive and enthusiastic about AI than the public" and "far more likely than Americans overall to believe AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on the United States over the next 20 years" (56 percent vs. 17 percent). And perhaps most glaringly, 76 percent of experts believe these technologies will benefit them personally rather than harm them (15 percent).

The public does not share this confidence. Only about 11 percent of the public says that "they are more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI in daily life." They're much more likely (51 percent) to say they're more concerned than excited, whereas only 15 percent of experts shared that pessimism. Unlike the majority of experts, just 24 percent of the public thinks AI will be good for them, whereas nearly half the public anticipates they will be personally harmed by AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] doodledup@lemmy.world -11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is collateral damage of societal progress. This is a phenomenon as old as humanity. You can't fight it. And it has brought us to where we are now. From cavemen to space explorers.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Which are separate things from people's ability to financially support themselves.

People can have smartphones and tech the past didn't have, but be increasingly worse off financially and unable to afford housing.

And you aren't a space explorer.

I'm not arguing about whether innovation is cool. It is.

I however strongly disagree with your claim that people being replaced is good. That assumes society is being guided with altruism as a cornerstone of motivation to create some Star Trek future to free up people to pursue their interests, but that's a fantasy. Innovation is simply innovation. It's not about whether people's lives will be improved. It doesn't care.

World can be the most technologically advanced its ever been with space travel for the masses and still be a totalitarian dystopia. People could be poorer than ever and become corpo slaves, but it would fit under the defition of societal progress because of innovation.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

People can have smartphones and tech the past didn't have, but be increasingly worse off financially and unable to afford housing.

You really have no idea what life was like just two or three generations ago. At least you now have toilet paper, water, can shower, and don't need to starve to death when the pig in your backyard dies of some illness. Life was FUCKING HARD man. Affording a house is your problem? Really?

And you aren't a space explorer.

The smoke detector, the microwave and birth control pills were invented around the time when we landed on the moon.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

People being economically displaced from innovation increasing productivity is good provided it happens at a reasonable pace and there is a sufficient social safety net to get those people back on their feet. Unfortunately those safety nets dont exist everywhere and have been under attack (in the west) for the past 40 years.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Yep that's my point. That they just assumed that it must be the case when that hasn't been the outcome with innovation not coinciding with improved affordable living. Instead it's just been further class divide despite advancements.

Innovation is its own separate thing from human outcomes, and advancement of improved human lives needs its own care and guidance. Its not going to improve just because science and tech is improving. Otherwise humans are no different than any other disposable resource from the view of the powers that be, and will be discarded and abused without care.