this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
737 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
3151 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Well, some pedophiles have argued that AI generated child porn should be allowed, so real humans are not harmed, and exploited.

I'm conflicted on that. Naturally, I'm disgusted, and repulsed. I AM NOT ADVOCATING IT.

But if no real child is harmed...

I don't want to think about it, anymore.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Issue is, AI is often trained on real children, sometimes even real CSAM(allegedly), which makes the "no real children were harmed" part not necessarily 100% true.

Also since AI can generate photorealistic imagery, it also muddies the water for the real thing.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I didn't think about that.

The whole issue is abominable, and odious.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

that is still cp, and distributing CP still harms childrens, eventually they want to move on to the real thing, as porn is not satisfying them anymore.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

eventually they want to move on to the real thing, as porn is not satisfying them anymore.

Isn't this basically the same argument as arguing violent media creates killers?

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago
[–] quack@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Understand you’re not advocating for it, but I do take issue with the idea that AI CSAM will prevent children from being harmed. While it might satisfy some of them (at first, until the high from that wears off and they need progressively harder stuff), a lot of pedophiles are just straight up sadistic fucks and a real child being hurt is what gets them off. I think it’ll just make the “real” stuff even more valuable in their eyes.

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I feel the same way. I've seen the argument that it's analogous to violence in videogames, but it's pretty disingenuous since people typically play videogames to have fun and for escapism, whereas with CSAM the person seeking it out is doing so in bad faith. A more apt comparison would be people who go out of their way to hurt animals.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I agree.

There's no helping actual pedophiles. That's who they are.