this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
90 points (98.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13758 readers
796 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wild the only effect the humanities have had the last few decades is some bullshit from a meth addict

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bolshechick@hexbear.net 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn, I think I at this point i actually prefer the old religious "humans are special and different from other animals cuz god have us the consciousness" shit to this new techno-religion "biological sucks, destroy consciousness and bring on the machines" shit. At least there were some Christians and shit throughout history that really cared about animals (and some other religions have been better). This shit is just anti-life completely

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or here's another idea. If this is actually a real threat, how about we treat it like one? We can simply choose not to develop certain technologies; we've done it multiple times. We've had the tech for human cloning for decades, but we decided it was unethical and to simply not pursue the technology. We could do the same for AI beyond a certain level of complexity.

Hell, if this really is a threat to the human race, I would fully support just outlawing computers entirely if that's what it took. Fuck it, we'll just go back to pen and paper. It would be an extreme step, but if that's what it takes, so be it. We can go full Dune, "thou shall not make a machine in the likeness of the human mind."

[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We could do the same for AI beyond a certain level of complexity

At the very least we ought to ban wasting more than a some number of GWh/year on training the same model as last year but with 100x parameters