this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)

News

28307 readers
3859 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Gov. Tate Reeves signed a tax overhaul bill into law that phases out Mississippi’s income tax over 14 years, aiming to make the state more economically competitive.

Due to typos, the bill nullifies intended economic growth triggers, potentially accelerating tax elimination.

It also cuts the grocery tax from 7% to 5%, raises the gas tax by 9 cents, and changes public employee retirement benefits.

Critics warn of a $2.6B annual revenue loss, risking vital services in the nation’s poorest state. Officials remain divided on the bill’s long-term impact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's one thing for states like FL, TX, and WA to do this, since they have tourism, oil, and/or high sales tax to make up for it. But Mississippi doesn't have anything going for it except for an efficient use of the alphabet in its name. This will absolutely cause the state to crumble even more and become more of a welfare state.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the rich technically make no income then regular working Americans end up paying more income tax than billionaires

Income tax disproportionately effects the poor unfortunately

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

No. Not really. That depends on the tax rates, my friend.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It sounds like it only goes to 0 if certain goals are met, otherwise it'll go down to, and then stay at 3%.

So if they can't figure something out like those other states, it won't go to 0.

Still a bad idea, but it's not a lets make it 0% right away then FAFO

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a further thought...

It'd be interesting if the tax could automatically increase if these goals that were met, were no longer met.

So to go from 3% to 2% you need to generate an extra billion revenue, but if you lose that revenue it then climbs back to 3%.

It would really complicate the system... you'd essentially need to always be set up to charge income tax, but then have a variable rate that updates the systems maybe quarterly or yearly. But you couldn't ditch the system entirely since you'd need companies to have a method to suddenly start charging it again if it had to go from 0% to 0.5%

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would really complicate the system...

I bet you could pitch it to TurboTax

Shit, I should delete my comment before they get any ideas.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago