this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
161 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

59597 readers
3187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So basically I would just have to screenshot the image or export it to a new file type that doesn't support their fancy encryption and then I can do whatever I want with the photo?

[–] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

The point is that they can show anybody interested the original with the signature from the camera.

The problem is that you can likely attack the camera's security chip to sign any photo, as internally the photo would come from the cmos without any signing and the camera would sign it before writing it to storage.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

i would probably download a cock and suck it

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's signed, not encrypted. Think of it as a chain of custody mark. The original photo was signed by person X, and then edited by news source Y. The validity of that chain can be verified, and the reliability judged based on that.

Effectively it ties the veracity and accuracy of the photo to a few given parties. E.g. a photo from a known good war photographer, edited under the "New Your Times" newspaper's licence would carry a lot more weight than a random unsigned photo found online, or one published by a random online rag print.

You can break the chain, but not fake the chain.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think you misunderstand what this does

It gives you a "certificate" that proofs that the Photo you took is genuine

It doesn't stop you from editing a Picture