this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
517 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

15130 readers
3409 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

5 seconds of google.

The origin of the term is traced to Charles Krauthammer, a conservative political columnist, commentator, and psychiatrist, who coined the phrase Bush derangement syndrome in 2003 during the presidency of George W. Bush. That "syndrome" was defined by Krauthammer as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency—nay—the very existence of George W. Bush".[9][10][11][12] The first use of the term Trump derangement syndrome may have been by Esther Goldberg in an August 2015 op-ed in The American Spectator; she applied the term to "Ruling Class Republicans" who are dismissive or contemptuous of Trump.[13] Krauthammer, in an op-ed commented that—in addition to general hysteria about Trump—the "Trump Derangement Syndrome" was the "inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and ... signs of psychic pathology".[12]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome#Origin_of_the_term

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Read it again, and tell me if you think that’s definitive.

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I can read it many times, but I can't understand it for you. TDS is an amorphism of BDS. Try again.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The phrase “may have” is not definitive as you seem to think.

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago

And the phrase "Can be traced back to" is more definitive than you seem to think. Guess we're at an impasse, since you lack reading comprehension.