this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
48 points (87.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43945 readers
648 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the future is probably going to resolve this one in time, and not that much time either. I don't see why LLM technology shouldn't eventually be able to perform adequate real-time translation, it's just a matter of continuing to develop the process.
Some languages will be more difficult than others, and translation will always be imperfect. But we don't need perfection, just better than our current fairly meh (but still impressively not bad) tools.
Actually, it is already able to perform high quality translation. But it's too expensive right now to use at scale.
It will always struggle, as would a human translator. The concept of a perfect translation itself is just not achievable since languages are not just word-swapped copies of each other where each target language word has the exact same meaning as its counter-part in the source language.