this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
840 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

66353 readers
4279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
840
OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use (arstechnica.com)
submitted 18 hours ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
318 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This more closely aligns with my perspective, although I also believe no work should be able to be covered by both copyright and patent (e.g. software).

I'm even willing to give longer terms as long as they are limited by the lifespan of the living sentient creator, and not subject to legal games around corporate personhood.

But, I can certainly see the motivations behind eliminating copyright entirely.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Absolutely, copyright or patent, not both. Though if, and only if, they function identically in duration, I wouldn't see the downside of having both other than additional expenses actually filing for both