this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1251 points (88.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9789 readers
217 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (36 children)

What if they were shooting your kids while hiding behind their own? Would you let them keep doing it while insisting that reprisals are off limits?

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, this is the problem I'm having with people picking sides. It's a giant crap-pile of the worst of humanity. People act like there's a good side. Nah, everything's a mess of generational hatred and I hate it all.

There needs to be a cease-fire. Hamas needs to release all hostages and then be permanently removed from power in Gaza, and Israel needs to help the Palestinians rebuild what has been destroyed, burry their dead with dignity and respect, and heavily compensate the families of those who have died.

The whole thing is out of control

[–] stewsters@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a ceasefire, then Hamas attacked. Hard to rebuild trust after that.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That may be so, but Israel clearly has the upper hand right now. It's within their power to put the breaks on. I understand the depth of their rage after what Hamas did, but they shouldn't soothe their sorrow with the blood of innocents

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well said. The only angels here are the innocents being slaughtered. The belligerents are all devils.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Interesting that you mentioned the removal of Hamas from power but not the current Isreali government.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If polling is accurate, they will be voted out soon enough. To remove Hamas one needs the ammo box, as they have removed the ballot box as an option.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but it doesn't require killing civilians to accomplish. Just assassinate the Hammas leadership until there's no one left who wants to risk it. Mossad is pretty good at tracking people down.

Cut off the head and the body will die.

But, that's pretending that Israel just wants to protect itself instead of looking for an excuse to genocide.

[–] GingerHobbit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

OOOoh now I understand! Just kill Hamas, it's easy! Wish we'd thought of that sooner. Wow, war must be a breeze. No innocents ever die in wars!

If we wanted a genocide it would have happened a hell of a lot quicker. Bombing the places where the refugees are gathered, for example, instead of telling them to get out of harm's way.

The whole situation is fucked, and war is fucked. There are no easy answers.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Finally someone that gets it... People think fighting those terrorists is just like a computer game, where the objective is simple and doable. Just stroll on and kill all of the Hamas leaders, which are conveniently located in the same room. Cue the 'boss fight' music!

They don't understand how these people operate.

[–] gever4ever@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean they sometimes literally march civilians in front of their troops in active combat. It doesn't help that their fighters are sometimes dressed as civilians, either.

The IDF also has to guard those humanitarian corridors themselves otherwise Hamas would shoot down all those trying to evacuate.

If Israel didn't care about civilian deaths the war would be over on October 8th.

[–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we wanted a genocide it would have happened a hell of a lot quicker

In one month and a half, Israel has killed 1 out of every 200 Gazans. For comparison, the death toll in Gaza is about 11000 civilians, while the death toll in Ukraine is 9700 (in 19 months). Isn't that quick enough to you?

Bombing the places where the refugees are gathered

instead of telling them to get out of harm’s way.

...only to bomb the people who are getting out of harm's way: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live-blog/israel-hamas-war-live-updates-rcna120252 https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/16/middleeast/israel-palestinian-evacuation-orders-invs/index.html https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/why-is-israel-attacking-south-gaza-after-telling-people-go-there-2023-10-25/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure that can change, too. I don't live there, so it didn't come to mind. My desires mean nothing to anyone by me- but I want the violence to stop.

I can't imagine that the Israeli people so close to the border are just totally fine with what happened to the civilians and likely would want their government overhauled- but again, I don't live there. I only know what the media as told me, and I acknowledge that all that could even be a lie.

It's messy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The government of Israel is at least somewhat democratic. That makes removing it a bit more thorny than removing an organization like Hamas, because one either has to effectively just force an election there, which carries the risk that the same people (or people with the same ideology, if you forbid the specific people currently in power) might just win it and keep things the same, or replace the entire system with something that isn't democratic, which is generally viewed as a bad thing in itself. It's also move salvageable though for the same reason: there's little chance that someone wanting peace and resolution will somehow take over Hamas, it would be antithetical to what their organization even is, but the policies of a government like Isreal's at least have the potential to dramatically shift if people wanting those things take hold of it.

[–] ThankYouVeryMuch@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Every government should be removed from power

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why you don't pick sides

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 1 year ago

For sure. It's hard to know what's true and what isn't. All we know is what the media tells us. Hopefully we'll know at some point

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

There's an infinite spectrum between "not shooting children" and "letting the other guy shoot yours"

Also, this "oh we're so much better and civilized" act really falls short when it has to be explained to you why shooting children is still bad even when you do it.

[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

False dilemma. There are ways to react that don't involve shooting children.

Even if there weren't, I wouldn't say "yeah shoot some children."

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

You're misrepresenting my position. It's, "yeah definitely shoot the terrorist, try to avoid shooting their hostages if you can."

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That isn't an option atm so just a pointless strawman being propped up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Makfreeman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't proportionality be a thing here? Reprisals would be acceptable if they did not result in a disproportionate loss of innocent civilians. Unfortunately it seems like Palestinian children's lives are much cheaper than Israeli lives. I hate saying it because I think all children deserve protection regardless of the actions of the people in power, be it hamas or idf.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Also the comparision isnt Palestinian children vs Israeli children. It is Palestinian children vs. grown armed men and women aka Soldiers.

Israel could have worked with insurgencies to target Hamas specifically, without having to bomb everything to rubble. That would have risked more soldiers lives though.

So they are weighting their soldiers lifes at a rate of about 200 Palestinains of which 80 are children.

For comparision. In WW2 about 4 Ally soldiers died for one civillian death in the Axis and about 6 Ally civillians, mostly Chinese, Polish, Ukranian and Russian, died for every Axis soldier. So the war of total annhilation, with death squads eradicating entire villages and concentration camps for mass murder still had a much lower rate of civillian to military deaths.

load more comments (32 replies)