World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
This dude is completely out of his mind.
I feel like he doesn't really understand most of what is happening but he just says the first thing that comes to mind when he hears stuff.
This is something happening in Europe as well though, you've probably noticed it if you follow Dutch politics. There are these people who just yell out stuff that sounds pretty good but once action has to be taken, they find out it's never as simple as they'd imagined it to be. The end result is they get nothing done and their disillusioned voters are too stubborn to admit that they were susceptible to populism.
Possibly related...
Source
That was established a long time ago
The ones who are completely out of their minds are the whole US government and the American people who chose this moron to represent and lead them.
No greater fool that the person or people who chose to follow a fool.
Yes, he's been exhibiting clear signs of dementia since like 2016, and it's only progressed since then. The man isn't even competent enough to tie his shoes without adult supervision.
He needs to be in a nursing home, not running the country.
Medical care in prison is better than not having insurance. He can go to prison and tell the COs he's going to tariff the commissary.
Yes, but he still is useful for the elite. He makes a big mess, they rich buy the parts for cheap and privatize them.
My understanding is that pressure on both Ukraine and Russia was basically part of the Trump administration's plan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Kellogg
Michael Kofman's has been skeptical of Trump's direction here, has said that he's likely to have problems getting Russia to go along with anything that isn't total capitulation for Ukraine, because the Kremlin thinks that it's going to win this militarily. He's also pointed out that Ukraine doesn't have any incentive to go along with something that puts it in a weaker position, which basically anything that Russia would accept, as things stand, would. And the war only stops if both sides feel that they're better off with it stopping.
The US has a finite amount of leverage here, unless it's willing to do something like put troops in, which it isn't willing to do.
EDIT: I also watched an analysis the other day from someone taking the position that Trump really views this in terms of scoring domestic political points
like, he's the peacemaker president, and Biden is the incompetent war president, which is a theme that he's been campaigning on. If one agrees with that, he also wants the war ended quickly, which places even more impractical constraints on Rubio and similar.
If we view it through the lens of him actually wanting Putin to win and Zelinsky to lose because of personal insult its even easier. He merely needs a pretext to stop support. Zelinsky can pick between a pretence of peace followed by Russia regrouping and crushing them and total capitulation.
Easiest way is to front load so many demands that they never sit down. The important thing isnt even so much Russia winning as much as getting to snub Z.
His actions being that of an ignorant 4 year old rollin on whatever he was told last makes him easier to comprehend
like, he's the peacemaker president, and Biden is the incompetent war president, which is a theme that he's been campaigning on. If one agrees with that, he also wants the war ended quickly, which places even more impractical constraints on Rubio and similar.
It is the same logic he used his first term when he made the deal with the Taliban to pull US troops out of Afghanistan. It was never going to work but he thought it looked good. The fact he lost and Biden got stuck with the aftermath was a bonus.
I never understood the criticism of Bidens handling of Afghanistan. He was given an impossible deadline (due to Trump) and followed through with what I imagine is minimal casualties. And at the end of the day, he did what three other president's coudlnt do, which was get us out of there.
It doesn't make sense because it isn't supposed to. That is the point.
If Trump had one in 2020 he would have been left with the same situation but his base would have praised him regardless of what he did.
You lost me at "plan".
He meant a concept of a plan.
I wouldn't bet on Trump and Musk being unwilling to put US troops on the ground. Right now they haven't because it'll look better if they can negotiate a deal without using force so Trump can brag about how skilled he is at negotiating.
But Trump won't be able to negotiate a deal because he couldn't negotiate his way out of a wet paper bag, so I expect us to deploy troops within the next 6 months.