this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
874 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
4165 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
874
CEO of Brave rants about "lefties," "glowies," George Soros (lemm.ee)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by LWD@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
274 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The IRS rules governing nonprofits still required the Mozilla Foundation to beg big to go big: the parent had to go find big grants from Soros, Ford, Knight, MacArthur, and give smaller grants to many. This put it in the lefties-only-no-righty-Irish-need-apply revolving-door personnel sector of NGOs and nonprofits (too many glowies there for me, too). Which meant I had a hostile MoFo over my head the minute I got CEO appointment from the MoCo board...

Of course I can't comment on anything about my exit, for reasons that only the most loopy HN h8ers still can't figure out.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43251203

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Glowies"? As in "glow in the dark CIA n-words"? Bro turned into Tarry Davis.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Urban dictionary says it's a term that refers to when an undercover government agent fails to blend in with whoever they're trying to blend in with.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would that apply to James Bond? I've always wondered how everyone in those movies didn't instantly know who he was. Kinda like Archer. Archer is definitely a glowie.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The books were clearer about this, in fairness. Bond wasn't a spy so much as an agent provocateur and a major part of his role was to cause disruption, panic and general fuss, but in a controlled way.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Agents provocateur are actually what we historically had to worry about just as much as spies. They're the guy who's just raring to go do something a bit risky or really wants to run security for your event. Doing what they say or aiding them will get you arrested.