Technology

38156 readers

277 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

106

Trump Calls On Congress To Pass The “Take It Down” Act—So He Can Censor His Critics (www.eff.org)

submitted 3 days ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@beehaw.org

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump says a lot of things that, if taken in a certain light, can be NCII. Might be a good idea to flag his posts on all platforms so that they can be further investigated by those platforms if this passes.

All with the goal to keep NCII off the internet, of course.

[–] PopeRigby@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

NCII?

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From the article:

While the bill is meant to address a serious problem—the distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII)

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How can the imagery be intimate if it's non-consensual?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Revenge porn

[–] PopeRigby@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

Ah, must have missed that. Thanks.