this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
87 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

2034 readers
373 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Reddit has begun issuing warnings to users to regularly upvote violent content with a view to taking harsher action in future.
  • The company says that it will consider expanding this action to other forms of content in future.
  • Users are concerned that this moderation tactic could be abused or just improperly implemented.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Accusations that could be thrown at the center(, if you keep in mind that we're downplaying our authoritarianism/manipulation/control for ourselves and allied countries, but are over-estimating or even inventing it for countries we dislike).
For now there's not a lot of internal dissent but it's already too much for them, so their reaction would probably increase with it.
And i.d.k. if you're an american, but you only have two political parties and it already seems too much, i'd never have guessed that D.Trump could have won with such worldwide unified campaign against him, there's a troubling lack of diversity on the net and in medias that isn't reflected in the polls/votes. And this criticism of populism as if it was a bad thing, ...

Direct democracy then.

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Utterly predictable to point of comical banality.

Deny, deflect, obfuscate, and blame anyone or anything else. Same song, every time.

History and their own current rhetoric is absolutely clear: the wannabe "champions of the people" are exactly like their fascist, corporatist, and theocratic authoritarian counterparts. Apologists, hypocrites and "whatabout-ists".

Bunch of temporarily inconvenienced oligarchs-in-waiting.

What are boot-licking "tankies" in reality?

Performative, gelatinous, invertebrate, amoral pussies, who'll forgive or talk around any atrocity committed by their cult for a glimmer of a chance to wield the power they purport to rail against.

All the while, seemingly completely unaware of the profound comedic irony and dissonance of their professed political stance, their moral posturing, and the depravity of their willingness to side with the most blood-soaked, murderous regimes and psychopaths in history.

And every time one points it out? "WhAtBoUt WhAtAbOuT wHaTaBoUt _________, HuH?!"

Good times, with these clowns.

[–] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The salaries of socialist leaders is much lower than in capitalist-owned countries, e.g. aligned with the median salary, more than enough to revert your argument, they're not here for the money but to serve. Corruption(, from the wealthy,) is also taken much more seriously than in our societies who even legalized lobbying anyway.

And do you see the problem in accusing me of hypocrisy and whataboutism at the same time ?

All the while, seemingly completely unaware of the profound comedic irony and dissonance of their professed political stance, their moral posturing, and the depravity of their willingness to side with the most blood-soaked, murderous regimes and psychopaths in history.

You're describing yourself supporting the west, who's been mostly the only responsible of wars, genocides, support to dictators, ..., since the colonization. The extent of our interventions isn't taught in schools or medias, and didn't stop in 1991.

If you believe in the atrocity propaganda demonizing our declared enemies, and the duty to bring them freedom, i'll continue to prefer living with them peacefully, in a world that would protect them&us

Not much to add

If we end this discussion with an author's recommendation each, i've found Michael Parenti pleasantly surprising.