this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
339 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

64653 readers
5471 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Normally, I’d be against blocking a transition to for-profit, but if Fuhrer Edison is on the other side, it’s easy to assume bad things happen if he gets his way. He’s a cartoon villain at this point.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

The polarity of evil has flipped so far that you can’t escape. Now anything good Musk does becomes bad in your view. Musk switches the polarity of the thing, rather than the other way around.

Musk kisses a puppy, you unfortunately must now hate puppies. Such a strong statement.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is because Musk is a direct competitor.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago

And potential buyer.

[–] sheevpalpafiend@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

Fuhrer Edison is a name that should be used in everyone's lexicon.

[–] cmac@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Musk wants to block it, so being against blocking it is the opposite of what he wants.