this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
96 points (99.0% liked)

World News

43971 readers
3299 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Satellite images suggest China is developing a massive nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, potentially matching the size and capabilities of U.S. supercarriers, analysts told NBC News.

The ship, possibly the Type 004, appears to feature four electromagnetic catapults for launching fighter jets, a design shift from China's current fleet.

Experts say this move aligns with China's goal of building a "blue-water navy" to rival the U.S.

While Beijing has not confirmed the project, U.S. officials view China's military expansion as a strategic challenge in the Indo-Pacific.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not quite? China already has 1, the type 003. Which while gas powered is able to carry a similar compliment as the Nimitz class and more than the French Charles de Gaulle.

Your also ignoring that China has 2 types of Amphibious Assault ships as well, the type 075 and 076. In terms of pure numbers, if you removed all of the US carriers, China will have a similar number of aircraft in their navy. The quality and abilities of these aircraft would be wildly in USA's favor, but that's not what you said.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In terms of pure numbers, if you removed all of the US carriers, China will have a similar number of aircraft in their navy.

To be fair, I assumed 30 aircraft on the Wasp and America class ships. 20 is a more realistic number, so my estimate was high. I don't know why I had it in my head that they could carry 30 aircraft each, but that was the basis of my claim. I was also under the impression that that 003 was another STOBAR carrier, rather than a CATOBAR.

Still, 9 US ships times 20 STOVL aircraft:

  • 180 US aircraft total.

001, 002, and 003 are reported to carry 24 STOBAR, 24 STOBAR, and 50 CATOBAR aircraft, respectively:

  • 98 Chinese aircraft total.

My claim of "more than twice as many" was wrong, but by single-digit margins.

Their Type 075 and 076 ships are described as "Helicopter Docks". To the best of my knowledge, China doesn't currently have any STOVL aircraft to operate off these ships. They are developing a STOVL aircraft, the J-35, which would almost certainly be able to operate off 075/076, but it's not operational yet. I'm disinclined to count the four operational 075s, and the 076 they are building.

The US Navy has 13 "Landing Platform, Docks" (San Antonio Class) that I'm not counting, because they only carry helicopters (up to 78 total) or tiltrotors (up to 65 total). They did do some evaluations on using them with the Harrier, but I dont think that went anywhere.

Pretty much every large ship in both navies can embark a couple helicopters; I'm not counting any of them either.