AnarchyChess

5390 readers

223 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

itszednotzee@sopuli.xyz

itszednotzee@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz

152

Are you better at chess than a 3 year old? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/anarchychess@sopuli.xyz

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But necessarily. Laslo Polgar tried to prove he could raise chess prodigies by teaching them from very young. His daughters became great chess players, Judit even beating Kasparov on a occasion.

However they did not have a laying curve that exceeded other people spending all of their time at chess. And they grew up as quite level headed individuals.

So one can't make a prodigy but spending much time learning something makes you better at it.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes but I doubt Polfar dedicated 8 hours a day to a single child at the age of 3 on. Plus, I doubt any of his kids are a 1555 elo when they were under 4 years old.