Privacy

5040 readers

1260 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

Be civil
No spam posting
Keep posts on-topic
No trolling

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

iopq@lemmy.world

786

Mozilla flamed by Firefox fans after promises to not sell their data go up in smoke (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by s38b35M5@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world

192 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The answer to "what is Firefox?" on Mozilla's FAQ page about its browser used to read:

The Firefox Browser is the only major browser backed by a not-for-profit that doesn’t sell your personal data to advertisers while helping you protect your personal information.

Now it just says:

The Firefox Browser, the only major browser backed by a not-for-profit, helps you protect your personal information.

In other words, Mozilla is no longer willing to commit to not selling your personal data to advertisers.

A related change was also highlighted by mozilla.org commenter jkaelin, who linked direct to the source code for that FAQ page. To answer the question, "is Firefox free?" Moz used to say:

Yep! The Firefox Browser is free. Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it, and we don’t sell your personal data.

Now it simply reads:

Yep! The Firefox Browser is free. Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it.

Again, a pledge to not sell people's data has disappeared. Varma insisted this is the result of the fluid definition of “sell” in the context of data sharing and privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mke@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You are leaving out the part where he said he thinks that they sounds weird.

That doesn't help. Also, his main reason remains "keep politics out of my project," completely missing the point that his stance is also political. It's the old "my politics aren't political because they're normal."

I believe he is still open to rewriting the docs to not use pronouns at all

That's even more political, and ridiculously so. Linux kernel docs refer to users as "they." Should they change it? Are they bringing in unnecessary politics into the sanctity of one of the world's greatest collaborative technical projects? Are they too fucking woke?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Documentation shouldn't have pronouns since that's the wrong tone

I think the dev probably just hasn't been exposed much to transgender people. Reacting with hate immediately doesn't help at all.

[–] mke@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

You're not even moving the goalposts, you're dancing with them.

I give you pointed arguments, you ignore them, then give me unrelated nonsense.

Documentation shouldn't have pronouns since that's the wrong tone

What do you mean wrong tone? Pronouns are in everyday conversation, in companies' documents and in the government's too. I'm reiterating to you, @Possibly linux, that they're in Linux Kernel documentation. Better call Torvalds and tell him to fix that tone. The singular they has been in use for over half a millenium, and is now used by so many people and institutions, it'd actually be easier to list those who refuse to use them.

I think the dev probably just hasn't been exposed much to transgender people. Reacting with hate immediately doesn't help at all.

I've seen folks calmly and respectfully explain to him what's wrong, but he just doubles down. Now we say, "maybe don't use that guy's software," and people like you come out of hiding to defend him. Clearly, any hate that may have been is gone—it's just snowflakes scared of pronouns, all the way down.