this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
34 points (84.0% liked)

science

16245 readers
354 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5277849

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/chrisdh79 on 2025-02-27 12:00:35+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BT_7274@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So the study asked them to consume 1500 extra calories per day? Regardless of the source, that’s a confounding variable right there. I’d like to see this done again with a steady calorie count and just a different source for those calories. Personally, if I go nuts on the junk foods for a meal I typically find myself compensating by eating less of my normal, healthier diet.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago

I mean, junk food diets tend to be more calorie dense

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the issue is volume though. ~3500 calories of “healthy” foods will be physically harder to consume than 2000 calories of healthy foods and 1500 calories of calorically dense food.