this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
884 points (99.3% liked)
PC Gaming
9632 readers
271 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
AI isn't human. Stop pretending it is. AI takes advantage of humans. Your argument is invalid.
I did mention previously about "in the future", some day, not today. LLMs are not AI, at least the kind of AI that I'm talking about.
But even taking your point, do we let a human always keep a job that an AI can do much for efficiently? What job protections should humans have from AIs? And for that matter, what job protections should humans have today, right now, regardless of AI? (For the record, I support Unions.)
We all need to figure this out, right now, as corporations are salavating at the though of an AI that can replace a human being's job.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
No amount of passage of time is going to make AI human. You all suggesting that in the future AI will have feelings and emotions and will care that people are prejudiced against it. You are arguing against a hypothetical that you have created in your head and isn't necessarily going to be a reality.
No, not at all. I'm saying that future AI will not just be dumb LLMs, they'll be more like functional code that can literally think for itself. That it will be able to create and learn (like humans do) to do jobs, and do those jobs well. Robots with brains, etc., like you see in the movies.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
And you won’t have to pay it anything. So it will put actual humans that need to eat to live out of jobs and out of homes.
Meanwhile it used the hard work of those humans to “learn” from, being the ultimate capitalist tool. Lets steal the labor of the masses in a way that makes sure they are never properly compensated for that labor again.
You are arguing in favor of technofeudalism.
No, I'm not, at all.
I'm arguing against prejudice, and for starting NOW to play how real AI will be used in our future society.
Personally, I believe in unions, I'm not looking to replace humans. But I sure as hell know that CORPORATIONS are looking to replace humans (and increase their profits).
So just trying to "stiffarm" pre-AI today via prejudice is not going to cut it. And that's what I see people trying to do, its irrational and unproductive. "Sticking your heads in the ground" never works.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
Possibly, although I seen no evidence that that is an inevitability. But even if it becomes reality we can change our association with AI then I don't see any reason to do anything right now.
I have yet to see any evidence that we are in any way progressing towards that world.
You haven't been an observer of humanity then. They have quite a track record (see "Etymology") of how they interact with new technologies and new ways of being.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
Okay I read that Wikipedia article and I absolutely no idea what point you're trying to make.
Did you read the first paragraph in the “Etymology” section?