this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
1482 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

34218 readers
1998 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

John Oliver cited a 5000% rise in search queries related to leaving Meta and deleting accounts. Among the topics mentioned in the analysis, attention was drawn to early Facebook's naivete with regard to moderation requirements, the constitutional framework, and a history of governmental interference.

Oliver debunks common right-wing "cry censorship" talking points, as well as the objective difficulty of moderation endeavors, and how direct threats by Trump may have influenced Zuckerberg's turnaround.

Oliver went on to suggest Signal, Mastodon, Bluesky, and Pixelfed as alternatives that "do not seem as desperate to fall in line with Trump". For those reluctant to completely ditch Meta, Oliver revealed a new site with step-by-step instructions to "make yourself less valuable to them".

The guide was a collaboration with the EFF, and includes settings' tweaks for Facebook and Meta, whose 98% of revenue comes from micro-targeting ads, the host previously cited, to increase privacy, and recommends Firefox, Privacy Badger, as "other measures" to take in order "to block advertisers and other third parties from tracking you".

The segment culminated in a mock advert, in which the new Meta's approach to moderation is coined as "Fuck it", and hints to racism, internet scams, and calls to genocide running rampant on Meta's platforms.

The clip reminds the origins of Facebook as a site to "rank college girls by hotness", and its implication in genocide in Myanmar, which was more thoroughly discussed in an Oliver's previous special on Facebook in 2018.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 2 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Why not just recommend adblockers? No ads, no revenue, no matter how much tracking.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Selling user profiling data is also worth money, even if you're not shown ads because of ad-blockers you bring value to the dataset by increasing it's size with useful demographic data.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But the thing is out of the big companies, basically none of them are in the business of selling the data they have. They are much better off if they don't allow competitors to grow by keeping all the data to themselves.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 19 hours ago

that's why the broligarchs are buddying up to the dictators. the bottom is falling out of the surveillance capitalism market for advertising because it was never as effective as the ad marketplace brokers said it was. so the broligarchs need to sell their spying on us service to someone else and they've elected for the police state

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)
  • Not easy for most users on app-based mobile/tablet devices.

  • (Puts on tinfoil hat) His parent company, Discovery-Warner Bros, probably wouldn't like that? And John Oliver makes his living through ad revenue.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not easy for mobile devices? Firefox-based browsers on mobile can have Ublock Origin :/

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

"Normal" people don't use Facebook through the browser. Heck, I know functional, working adults, and reasonably smart kids, that don't really understand the concept of a browser/URLs and just do everything through apps, bar the bare minimum for work.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 20 hours ago

Or, even worse, they think that the internet is Google and vice versa.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago

It looks like they got that list of tips from the EFF, who created Privacy Badger. So it’s not surprising they only recommended theirs. I agree though that they should include uBO in the list.