this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
1285 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 202 points 3 days ago (4 children)

A headline without calling it an "Artificial Sun"?!

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 70 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The power of the sun in the palm of my hand.

[–] MalMen@masto.pt 14 points 3 days ago

@Toribor @notsoshaihulud with great power comes great responsibility

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Don't worry, it will stabilize

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The amusing thing is that the sun is actually quite a shit fusion reactor. It's power per unit volume is tiny. It just makes it up in sheer volume. A solar level fusion reactor would be almost completely useless to us. Instead we need to go far beyond the sun's output to just be viable.

It's like describing one of the mega mining dumper trucks as an "artificial mule".

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think this energy density math really depends on whether only the core or the whole surface area is taken into consideration.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Even the core only has an output of 200-300W/m^3.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's about the energy output per volume of a 70 year old cyclist.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right, for the Americans here that hate metric.

Cyclist-years is a unit that has served us well for generations

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Sure, but it makes up for that by having an idiot proof design.

[–] lurklurk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Arguably, the nearby sun scale fusion reactor has been fairly useful for us. Nowadays we can convert its output directly into electricity using solar cells

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I never said it wasn't useful, just a very low efficiency reactor. Then again, if it was better, it would burn out faster, which would be bad for life on earth.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It produces about the same power per cubic metre as compost does, which is pretty crazy when you think about it.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What I'm hearing is that we should mine the sun and make better use of all that fuel.

Just make sure you do it at night.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's part of the reason a moon base could be viable. The sun outputs a reasonable amount of helium 3, which is great for fusion reactions. Unfortunately it tends to sit at the top of our atmosphere and get blown away again. On the moon, it gets captured by the dust in collectable quantities.

Someone once told me a sun is just a fusion nuclear pile reactor and... Like... I guess.

[–] yogurt@lemm.ee 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They say "artificial sun" because that's what it is though, there's no fusion reactions here they're just microwaving hydrogen to millions of degrees to study the kind of thing that would happen IF somebody runs a fusion reactor for 22 minutes.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 13 points 3 days ago

A bulb in a bong