this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
550 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6655 readers
3150 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

right but you’re leaving out the united states’ full backing

I am not. That's why I said 10 to 1 instead of much more. That said, I actually had it a little bit wrong, I just now looked up the real numbers.

The US plus all partners has sent about $150 billion in total, it looks like, up until the middle of last year: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303432/total-bilateral-aid-to-ukraine/

As of the beginning of last year, Russia had spent about $211 billion: https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2024/02/16/ukraine-war-has-cost-russia-up-to-211-billion-pentagon-says/

We can add to that a little, maybe 25% to say that the war went on for six more months before it's an apples-to-apples comparison more or less, but the point is, by that metric, Russia outspent Ukraine-plus-allies by just under 2-to-1. Without counting PPP.

I actually couldn't find exact PPP numbers for Russia, and it's been going wild during the war. All I could find was that in 2022 it was 29 to 1. I'm not going to try to claim that's the number, that was right during the currency crash. That does explain why their PPP-adjusted GDP is so high. They're doing great!

So, the punchline (I've been digging up numbers as writing this): This is, more or less, what I was looking at that made me say Russia was outspending Ukraine+allies by 10 to 1: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/02/12/russias-2024-military-spending-surpassed-eu-uk-combined-in-ppp-terms-study-a87974

Russia's PPP-adjusted defense spending is just under half a trillion per year. That's what I understood it to be. So, they've been fighting for three years now, means a trillion and a half dollars on their side, versus $150 billion on the other side from allies plus whatever minuscule amount of money Ukraine was able to add to that. Plus rivers of Ukrainian blood. Means Russia is fielding 10 times more military kit than Ukraine is, and still not winning, and they've been at it for three years.

They may be making progress (they're inching forward month by month, yes), and Ukraine may collapse because of any number of reasons. It's still not a good advertisement for Russia's military or economic prowess. They have been mobilizing their entire formidably-sized country to try to win this thing.