It wasn't necessary. They could have foreseen the need for an independent commission to verify the numbers that local officials were reporting. They could have cracked down harder on sabotage of planting and harvesting and the mass slaughter of livestock by kulaks.

Industrialization was necessary. If they didn't push hard for industrialization we might all be speaking German right now. They cut it close to the wire and the mistakes that they made resulted in mass suffering. But there were no more famines with the exception of post ww2 after that famine, in an area that previously frequently had famines, because collectivization worked once the kinks were worked out.

[–] aport@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rapid industrialization at the cost of millions of lives was only a necessity because Stalin insisted on Socialism in One Country.

Had proletariat revolutions not failed elsewhere, especially Western Europe, there would be no need for such a haphazard and reckless transition.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but how was the soviet union to create a global proletarian revolution? They had to work with what they had.

[–] aport@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could ask Trotsky but Stalin had him murdered 🤷

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I've read Trot stuff and found their arguments unconvincing in this context. Global proletarian revolution is something we all have to exercise agency over, if youre in the soviet union you can't just rely on everyone else spontaneously uprising, you have to plan for that not happening. And it didn't happen, so...