this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
519 points (94.7% liked)

Asklemmy

45245 readers
902 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 246 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

The problem is that when you push an object, the push happens at the speed of sound in that object. It's very fast but not anywhere near the speed of light. If you tapped one end of the stick, you would hear it on the moon after the wave had traveled the distance.

For example, the speed of sound in wood is around 3,300 m/s so 384,400/3,300 ~= 32.36 hours to see the pole move on the moon after you tap it on earth.

[โ€“] Metostopholes@midwest.social 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your math is off. The Moon is about 384,400 KILOmeters from the Earth, not meters. So 116,485 seconds, or a bit over 32 hours.

[โ€“] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 week ago

Oh right. I'll edit my comment

[โ€“] ech@lemm.ee 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I swear I've seen a video of someone timing the speed of pushing a very long pole to prove this very thing. If I can find it I'll post it here.

*Found it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqhXsEgLMJ0 I can't speak to the rigorousness of the experiment, but I remember finding it enlightening.

[โ€“] nef@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

AlphaPhoenix is definitely one of the best scientists on YouTube, that video is good.

[โ€“] 0ops@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Cool vid, thanks for sharing

[โ€“] TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Damn, so that means no FTL communication for now... ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] sbv@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hear me out... What about a metal stick?

[โ€“] DemBoSain@midwest.social 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Metal is a lot heavier than wood. You'd never be able to lift it to the moon.

[โ€“] ChanchoManco@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But can you lift it from the moon? Gravity is a lot lower there.

[โ€“] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

You should make it out of feathers. Steel is heavier than feathers.

[โ€“] ech@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

NASA: "Hold my beaker."

[โ€“] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Hold on, let me check. I don't think so

[โ€“] anus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow, TIL that the speed of sound has this equivalence

[โ€“] Azzu@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's why rocket nozzles can't be infinitely thin :)

[โ€“] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't get it. Care to explain?

[โ€“] Azzu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are multiple forces at work in a converging rocket nozzle:

  1. The exhaust is pushed outward faster since the hole is smaller, giving the rocket extra thrust
  2. The exhaust hits the wall of the nozzle as it gets thinner, braking the rocket

These two effectively cancel out, which is why the actual effect of making the nozzle thinner/converge is that it increases the back pressure within the engine (constricted space, smaller hole), essentially (idk how) increasing the efficiency of the fuel burning.

However, when the nozzle gets too thin, the exhaust becomes faster than its speed of sound. Since the pressure travels at the speed of sound, it can now not actually get back into the engine anymore. So that's the limit of how thin you can make the nozzle. The pressure has to get back into the engine to have its effect, so you can't make the exhaust travel faster than its speed of sound.

If any of this sounds wrong to anyone, let me know, I'm not an expert in this.