this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
141 points (98.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13691 readers
46 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bottom textthis is not an endorsement of the zyzzians, this is a shitpost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fully on board the ontic structural realism and extended cognition bus. Just pointing out that it absolutely is a metaphysical position, and that giving arguments for it is doing metaphysics.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fair. Metaphysics actually seems to be a fuzzy term: it can mean studying the relationship between mind and matter i.e. what I'm doing (although really I'm saying that "mind" can not be separated from matter, they are the same thing) and speculation about scientifically unanswerable questions i.e. beyond physics. I only mean to say that there's nothing nonphyiscal or immaterial about the self. It can be contained and explained purely through materialism.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

I agree entirely; philosophy of science is philosophy enough, to paraphrase Quine. If you haven't read it (and are interested in some pretty hard-core contemporary philosophical elucidation of this stuff), you might enjoy James Ladyman's book Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.