this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
157 points (98.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13764 readers
957 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This attitude annoys me. I understand why it's pragmatic for the PRC to be non-interventionist, but to state this idealistic poetry shows a lack of understanding that capitalism is a global system with global consequences. We probably don't have 100 years to screw around fighting our fascists at home without help, and Chinese citizens will feel global warming and environmental devastation about as harshly as we will.

Imagine if the CPC said this about Korea or Vietnam.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Intervention has already been tried and it led to the Eastern bloc overextending and collapsing. Soaking up the worlds industrial potential and turning the power production green seems like not a bad idea

Also Vietnam and Korea are bordering nations, nations that had their own communist governments to support.

[–] Mickmacduffin@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Also the egg can never hatch if mother hen never sits on it?