this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
157 points (95.9% liked)
chapotraphouse
13669 readers
908 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Go ahead and give it a go champ no one is stopping you. Don't forget to cite your sources.
Source: some guy said so
Ok, "genocide is always wrong" Source: Basic human decency.
Hey it's been 16 hours now, and I see that you've been posting through that time so I just want to let you know how predictably pathetic and intellectually lazy your behavior is. It's honestly fucking disgusting to go around saying shit like that, without evidence, when Israel has showed the entire world what a genocide looks like in the modern media environment. You should feel deeply ashamed to conduct yourself like you have here, but I have a feeling you won't reflect on this at all.
Yeah I gave up after people freaked the fuck out because I said "genocide bad". I didn't even claim that China WAS committing genocide just that if they were it's bad and y'all can't even handle that. There's really no reasoning with anyone that far gone.
Lmao I haven't seen this tactic since I graduated fro. kindergarten. You're trying to do the "I didn't even say the bad word! I said nickel! I'm allowed to say it!"
Dude. You know we can go back in the thread and read what you actually said, right?
You were then asked for proff of your claims, to cite your sources and you decided instead to be a shitheel pretending like we were talking about wether or not genocides are bad. Of course they are. I'm not a linguist so I don't have the academic language to explain this to you, but I don't have to because you understand basic conversations - You said China was committing a genocide. That's why it's a qualifier in that statement. If you were saying what you are trying to pretend you're saying, you would have phrased the whole statement quite differently. But we both know this, you're trying to evade the subject. But why?
You obviously believe China is doing a genocide and you believe it to such an extent you're willing to open dialogue with a bunch of people you know thinks otherwise. So you must be very well educated on the subject. Why then flee when people ask you to share your sources, your research, your knowledge? Genuinely, what is your major malfunction? What is wrong with you?
Anyway, what you are doing is so fucking funny holy shit thank you for the laugh. Never imagined people as pathetic as you could exist. If I used you as inspiration for a character and put it in a play I'd get told it was unrealistic, nobody is that much of a cretin. But you are. And stupid too. Like what a sad attempt at rhetoric. The fact you think anyone would be buying it oh my god, is your social circle exclusive made up of golems constructed of bricks? Dense motjerfucker.
Why are you doing this? What does it give you? Are you trying to save face? In that case you would do much more by admitting you don't know what you're talking about.
By the way zoophilia is a bad thing for you to do. Also pedophilia, really just a terrible thing to do.
The Uyghurs in Xinjiang
Anti-Communists and Sinophobes claim that there is an ongoing genocide-- a modern-day holocaust, even-- happening right now in China. They say that Uyghur Muslims are being mass incarcerated; they are indoctrinated with propaganda in concentration camps; their organs are being harvested; they are being force-sterilized. These comically villainous allegations have little basis in reality and omit key context.
Background
Xinjiang, officially the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, is a province located in the northwest of China. It is the largest province in China, covering an area of over 1.6 million square kilometers, and shares borders with eight other countries including Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Russia, Mongolia, India, and Pakistan.
Xinjiang is a diverse region with a population of over 25 million people, made up of various ethnic groups including the Uyghur, Han Chinese, Kazakhs, Tajiks, and many others. The largest ethnic group in Xinjiang is the Uyghur who are predominantly Muslim and speak a Turkic language. It is also home to the ancient Silk Road cities of Kashgar and Turpan.
In the aftermath of the Cold War, several factors contributed to a resurgence of separatist sentiment among Uyghur nationalists in Xinjiang. Since the early 2000s, there have been a number of violent incidents attributed to extremist Uyghur groups in Xinjiang including bombings, shootings, and knife attacks. Some high-profile examples include:
In 2014-2016, the Chinese government launched a "Strike Hard" campaign to crack down on terrorism in Xinjiang, implementing strict security measures and detaining thousands of Uyghurs. In 2017, reports of human rights abuses in Xinjiang including mass detentions and forced labor, began to emerge.
The Material Conditions Necessary for Terrorism and Extremism
As materialists, we understand that terrorists don't magically appear out of thin air. There are material reasons for people resorting to such extreme measures. In order to combat the threat of rising extremism, these reasons must be indentified and resolved. One of the main causes is economic marginalization. When people are economically disadvantaged or excluded from mainstream economic activity, they may be more likely to turn to extremism as a way to address their grievances and gain a sense of purpose. Generally speaking, people who feel like they have a bright future do not resort to terrorism. It is only when people feel hopeless or trapped that they resort to such measures.
If the issue is that the Uyghurs were disenfranchised, and that is the reason they were susceptible to religious fundamentalism and resorting to terrorism, then surely the solution is to enfranchise them to remove that material condition. This is what the Strike Hard campaign ultimately sought to accomplish.
Counterpoints
There is only flimsy evidence for the most egregious of the allegations being made about what China is doing in Xinjiang, it should be an easy matter to dismiss. Normally, the burden of evidence lies with the party making the claims. However, Western media is happy to spread rumours and present the allegations as having merit because it serves America's imperialist interests. Additionally, given the severity of the allegations and the gravity of the crimes China is being accused of, this issue has been taken very seriously by the international community, especially the international Muslim community.
The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the second largest organization after the United Nations with a membership of 57 states spread over four continents. The OIC released Resolutions on Muslim Communities and Muslim Minorities in the non-OIC Member States in 2019 which:
In this same document, the OIC expressed much greater concern about the Rohingya Muslim Community in Myanmar, which the West was relatively silent on.
Over 50+ UN member states (mostly Muslim-majority nations) signed a letter (A/HRC/41/G/17) to the UN Human Rights Commission approving of the de-radicalization efforts in Xinjiang:
The World Bank sent a team to investigate in 2019 and found that, "The review did not substantiate the allegations." (See: World Bank Statement on Review of Project in Xinjiang, China)
Even if you believe the deradicalization efforts are wholly unjustified, and that the mass detention of Uyghur's amounts to a crime against humanity, it's still not genocide. Even the U.S. State Department's legal experts admit as much:
A Comparative Analysis: The War on Terror
China is not the only country to have faced faced a challenge of this nature. The United States, in the wake of "9/11", saw the threat of terrorism and violent extremism due to religious fundamentalism as a matter of national security. They invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 in response to the 9/11 attacks, with the goal of ousting the Taliban government that was harbouring Al-Qaeda. The US also launched the Iraq War in March 2003, which was justified by the Bush administration as a response to Iraq's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction and links to terrorism. However, these claims turned out to be unfounded.
According to a report by Brown University's Costs of War project, at least 897,000 people, including civilians, militants, and security forces, have been killed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Yemen, and other countries. Other estimates place the total number of deaths at over one million. The report estimated that many more may have died from indirect effects of war such as water loss and disease. The war has also resulted in the displacement of tens of millions of people, with estimates ranging from 37 million to over 59 million.
The War on Terror also popularized such novel concepts as the "Military-Aged Male" which allowed the US military to exclude civilians killed by drone strikes from collateral damage statistics. (See: ‘Military Age Males’ in US Drone Strikes)
In summary:
Which one of those responses sounds genocidal?
Side note: It is practically impossible to actually charge the U.S. with war crimes, because of the Hague Invasion Act.
Who is driving the Uyghur genocide narrative?
Let's review some of the people and organizations involved in strongly promoting this narrative.
One of the main proponents of these narratives is Adrian Zenz, a German far-right fundamentalist Christian and Senior Fellow and Director in China Studies at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, who believes he is "led by God" on a "mission" against China has driven much of the narrative. His anti-Communist and anti-China stances influence his work and makes him selective in his use of data. He relies heavily on limited and questionable data sources, particularly from anonymous and unverified Uyghur sources, coming up with estimates based on assumptions which are not supported by concrete evidence. He also ignores the broader historical and political context of the situation in Xinjiang, such as the history of separatist movements and terrorism in the region.
The World Uyghur Congress, headquartered in Germany, is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) which is a tool of U.S. foreign policy, using funding to support organizations that promote American interests rather than the interests of the local communities they claim to represent.
Radio Free Asia (RFA) is part of a larger project of U.S. imperialism in Asia, one that seeks to control the flow of information, undermine independent media, and advance American geopolitical interests in the region. Rather than providing an objective and impartial news source, RFA is a tool of U.S. foreign policy, one that seeks to shape the narrative in Asia in ways that serve the interests of the U.S. government and its allies.
The first country to call the treatment of Uyghurs a genocide was the United States of America. In 2021, the Secretary of State declared that China's treatment of Uyghurs and other ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang constitutes "genocide" and "crimes against humanity." Both the Trump and Biden administrations upheld this line.
Why is this narrative being promoted?
As materialists, we should always look first to the economic base for insight into issues occurring in the superstructure. In this case, there is a compelling material reason for the US the promote a narrative of a genocide occurring in Xinjiang.
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a massive Chinese infrastructure development project that aims to build economic corridors, ports, highways, railways, and other infrastructure projects across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Middle East. The project has been described as a new Silk Road, connecting China with its neighboring countries and expanding trade and economic ties with the rest of the world.
The BRI includes plans for major infrastructure projects in Xinjiang. These projects aim to improve connectivity and facilitate trade between China and countries in Central Asia and beyond. The Xinjiang region is critical part of the Belt.
For the United States, the BRI is a threat to its economic and political dominance. For one, the BRI could undermine US efforts to promote "free trade" agreements, which have often been used to lock in economic reforms and policies that benefit American corporations. The BRI also threatens to undermine US influence in key regions of the world, particularly in Asia and Africa, by providing countries with an alternative source of financing and investment that is not tied to US-led institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Moreover, the BRI could help to shift the global balance of power away from the United States and towards China. By expanding its economic influence and deepening its ties with other countries, China could emerge as a more formidable competitor to the United States in the global arena.
Promoting the Uyghur genocide narrative harms China and benefits the US in several ways. It portrays China as a human rights violator which could damage China's reputation in the international community and which could lead to economic sanctions against China; this would harm China's economy and give American an economic advantage in competing with China. It could also lead to more protests and violence in Xinjiang, which could further destabilize the region and threaten the longterm success of the BRI.
Additional Resources
Video Essays:
Books, Articles, or Essays:
Social Media Resources, Threads, and Masterposts:
Fuck me these are great responses. I'm personally a fan of "long post with narrative/historiography and cited sources" over cited sources alone. It conveys the point so much better.
I can't take the credit, this is the fine work of the folks over at The Deprogram wiki. I've read through it a few times, it's just a great write-up, that I keep it on hand, so I don't have to do all the heavy lifting. I think at some point I'll synthesize my own write-up based on it and others, never enough time.
I wish we did a monthly mega thread focused on producing texts like this to combat different lib talking points. Its so nice to just be able to link these threads instead.
I 100% agree. If we owned some kind of Wiki project, that would be really cool. I feel like prolwiki isn't exactly a debunking wiki.
Reddit links were detected in your comment. Here are links to the same locations on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
Link 1:
Link 2:
I found YouTube links in your comment. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Link 1:
Link 2:
Link 3:
You are such a fucking loser omg. You obviously said China is committing genocide otherwise why the hell would it even be brought up? Literally everyone would agree that China would be in the wrong to commit a genocide, but they aren't. You gave up because you can't produce a source for the very serious claim you initiated while also being incapable of self reflection and growth. Unreal levels of loserdom.
yo @REgon@hexbear.net @AtomPunk@hexbear.net @Doubledee@hexbear.net @RedWizard@hexbear.net @Alaskaball@hexbear.net @CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net @OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml @Aradina@hexbear.net get in here and look at this shit lmao
I believe this was #6 on REgon's list, but it's so incredibly pathetic it's still not a perfect fit. Actually inventing a new type of shit stain live in front of our eyes today, so thanks for that.
"You guys asked me to substantiate my claim so I pivoted to saying I wasn't actually claiming anything. That makes me the debate winner."
::: spoiler Fantastic thank you so much. Literally doing the 'I'm not touching you' thing dumbass kids would do.
I thought the response was to me initially and I was very confused lmao
Haha just sent everyone a little jump scare didn't I. Probably not the best opening line for pinging a bunch of people.
It got my attention though, so it was effective lol
I really don't understand why people are like this. And you're right this is a new strain of smuglord
Calling all the boys over for a nice circle jerk?
Eyyy now we're back on the dialogue tree! You chose #4 which isn't my favourite, it's actually probably the saddest possible option, because you just look pathetic.
Anyway for someone interested in a good discussion - you must be, since what else did you have to "give up on"? Why did you decide to go this route instead of answering one of the many people providing you with literature explaining our position? Why did you not do the same yourself?
People like you like to pretend like we're just hostile out of nowhere, as if your putrid aura didn't emanate from every condescending word you typed out. I hope you one day grow as a person and attain some humility, but I really doubt it.
Anyway can you say "Israel is committing a modern Holocaust, aided by Joe Biden and now Donald Trump. I think that's bad and they should be stopped"? That's an actual genocide going on, and that is bad.
Oh an I'm not a boy, thank you for misgendering me 💅 Liberals are bigots and you're a good example
It's crazy how with every comment you make here it becomes even more clear that you really are a fuckin loser with pure dogshit for brains lol
In all fairness we did wish for some dumbass clown to dunk on. But this is all they have, real meaningful narrative with sources is above them, otherwise they would have responded to RedWizard with literally anything.
It's like the most predictable monkey's paw
We snagged a liberal!
They're completely incapable of meaningful participation in the topic they brought up themselves
Lmao typical. You're trying to snake your way around what was the actual argument - that there isn't a genocide going on.
This was the obvious thing you were asked for sources on. That you are trying to weasel your way out is also obvious.
Here's the next possible steps for your dialogue tree
Don’t they teach you to cite your sources in like fifth grade?
Pathetic.
Prove they are committing a genocide. Cite your sources.
Zenz Zenz Zenz Zenz