this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
154 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
4700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:

The launch of Chinese AI application DeepSeek in the U.S. has raised national security concerns among officials, lawmakers, and cybersecurity experts. The app quickly became the most downloaded on Apple's store, disrupting Wall Street and causing a record 17% drop in Nvidia's stock. The White House announced an investigation into the potential risks, with some lawmakers calling for stricter export controls to prevent China from leveraging U.S. technology.

Beyond economic impact, experts warn DeepSeek may pose significant data security risks, as Chinese law allows government access to company-held data. Unlike TikTok, which stores U.S. data on Oracle servers, DeepSeek operates directly from China, collecting personal user information. The app also exhibits censorship, blocking content on politically sensitive topics like Tiananmen Square. Some analysts argue that, as an open-source model, DeepSeek may not be as concerning as TikTok, but critics worry its widespread adoption could advance China’s influence through curated information control.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well yeah, it’s obviously more of a risk to send directly to your rival than internally. Both are risky but one is much, much worse.

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And what exactly is the average person sending to China that's such a threat to US global Imperialism?

Sure, ban it on government devices or whatever you want to do, but why should civilians be punished because the government can't embezzle as efficiently?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of stuff. You analyze that data, you can refine your psyops.

[–] 0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And why should I be more worried about a hypothetical psyop that i might experience than the current psyops that I am experiencing?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

You are experiencing psyops from every direction. Some are just more obvious than others.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

And what exactly is the average person sending to China that's such a threat to US global Imperialism?

Am agreeink with these quesiton. Too many US politicians are not great leaders like Putin. And China.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stupid users send private keys and other secrets to their AIs all the time. This is a big fucking threat to US global imperialism.

The US trusts OpenAI (even if they shouldn’t) to not send hackers after US companies. They definitely don’t trust Chinese companies to have the same restraints.

Unfortunately that's just a danger on the internet. Stupid users are gonna get scammed whether it's a stock trading AI that empties your bank account when you link it or a Nigerian Prince who just needs $5000 so he can unlock his fortune and repay you $100,000.

Even then, what national security upending information does the average citizen have stored on their phone that they're just whimsically uploading anywhere that'll take a PDF? Like I said, I understand restrictions on devices used by government officials for official purposes, but to ban it unilaterally for civilian use as well seems excessive.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Internally"

This guy really loves his oligarchs and their government haha

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah, I’m speaking from the perspective of the US, since the article is about US policy. The decision making is obvious when you’re thinking at a national protectionist level.

Obviously privacy violations are bad for the user regardless. Never trust your corporations or government!

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Youa re speaking on behalf of daddy Sam?

Damn boy, is u elite?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The hell are you talking about? It’s right there in the article. But maybe you didn’t read it?

Ad hominem attacks like you are using are a sign you don’t have anything useful to say.