this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
277 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13669 readers
1213 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

2 Trillion dollars in U.S. Stock market cap erased in a day by DeepSeek, which was released only a day after the US announced a 500 billion dollar investment in AI.

DeepSeek only invested 5.6 million dollars in computing power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KnilAdlez@hexbear.net 84 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I remember reading about how the US was funding a ton of solar panel manufacturing, then when China made them cheaper than the US could, dragged the world back to oil. I wonder if the US will try the same trick here.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 63 points 3 days ago

Fun fact, the US solar panel output is much lower than its on-paper capacity because all that investment went into the end of the pipeline and very little into the beginning, so things like polysilicon availability are causing supply chain bottlenecks. imaginator

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They will ban Deepseek for “national security” reasons that are never detailed or elaborated on. Like TikTok.

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They’ll never be able to. It’s open source software

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wish I could believe that would stop them from trying.

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure they’ll try but that doesn’t change what open source means

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ok but they can ban the deepseek website and it’s api. Some American company with money to burn on hosting it can spin another one up, i guess, but that sure doesn’t feel like a victory for open source.

Or they could just do something like what they do for encryption algorithms.

[–] Shmandom@feddit.uk 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You mean drag back translators, artists, writers... from unemployment, to give them the work that was stolen by "AI"?

Sounds like a win to me 👍

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 days ago

nah, they won't actually benefit the workers, they'll just outsource work somewhere

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

I wonder if the same people who were funding and pro-AI stealing from artists and writers will suddenly talk about the eeeevils of AI now that China is better at it then them.