this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

chapotraphouse

13758 readers
814 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

whoops no this is UC Davis in 2011. the cop pepper spraying these nonviolent student protestors filed for worker's compensation claiming "psychiatric damage" due to having his name released and won more than $38k USD in compensation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I'm sorry, you are right that there is oppression in the US, but to suggest that this incident is somehow equivalent to the Tiananmen Square Massacre, where people were run over with tanks, and their remains hosed down the street drains, is absolutely disgusting.

The term "false equivalence" doesn't even begin to describe this. The disrespect for what happened is so reprehensible that it completely invalidates any point you might be trying to make. People died in Tiananmen Square.

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

people were run over with tanks, and their remains hosed down the street drains

no they weren't. about 300 people died in clashes outside the square, more than half of which were PLA and police.

The Myth of Tiananmen and the price of a passive press | Columbia Journalism Review

The Tian’anmen Square ‘Massacre’: The West’s Most Persuasive, Most Pervasive Lie. | Mango Press

https://www.qiaocollective.com/education/tiananmenreadinglist

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wtf this is literally George Foreman 1989

I thought you were gonna link to a source but instead you're linking slam poetry you absolute bozo

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)