this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13673 readers
635 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Wow so cyberpunk! Omg a train goes through a building!!! Wow it looks like I'm at ground level but I'm actually 20 stories up!"

Fuck, as a westerner who low key wants to go to Chongqing I am now owned :/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they're joking, but, yeah, that is a really weird Left thing. I understand having a class analysis about who can travel but I don't pay attention to people who say not to do it at all. Traveling is one of the most meaningful experiences I have in life. You should still go, if you can!

And it sounds more like they're making fun of influencers posting those videos which is understandable—not necessarily tourists just being awed. But if they made fun of tourists is like New Yawkers making fun of tourists for standing around and clogging the streets looking up at skyscrapers, or Parisians making fun of tourists who don't speak perfect French, or whatever other city making fun of outsiders. Everyone does it in different ways. You're going to be impressed if you go because you're not taking that extraordinary feat of humanity for granted.

[–] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they're joking

At least two were on here and they sounded pretty serious.

I can perhaps understand the analysis that modern bourgeois tourism isn't really sustainable, but I think "never leave the commune you were born in" is a little radical. The USSR actually had a good variety of travel within the Union, Cuba has state run beach resorts, I think there can be a sustainable model of tourism.