Technology

Not even guaranteed to be the closest data center. It’s not completely out of the ordinary for there to be a faster route available to a data center farther away.

Agreed. Privacy is always a balance between your threat model and useability. If your general location is enough to put you in danger, hopefully you're already aware of how your data is being sent over the various networks and have measures in place to stay safe.

For most people, knowing very generally where they are isn't especially useful information to anyone with an interest in surveillance.

On the one hand, deanonimization attacks are never entirely avoidable on unhardened targets and this one isn't particularly sophisticated and leaks relatively little information.

On the other hand deanonimization attacks are always bad and it's a good reminder to people of the risks they are taking. This is also slightly non-obvious behavior, even if it makes sense to the technically competent, as something like an IP grabber normally requires user interaction such as clicking a link. It's also a vector that CF might be able to mitigate by patching the ability to query a given cache directly.