this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
201 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60636 readers
3705 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] small44@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

What about the writing and reading speeds?

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you care about that, spinning rust is not the right solution for you.

[–] JGrffn@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I mean, newer server-grade models with independent actuators can easily saturate a SATA 3 connection. As far as speeds go, a raid-5 or raid-6 setup or equivalent should be pretty damn fast, especially if they start rolling out those independent actuators into the consumer market.

As far as latency goes? Yeah, you should stick to solid state...but this breathes new life into the HDD market for sure.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 6 points 13 hours ago
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 hours ago

The speed usually increases with capacity, but this drive uses HAMR instead of CMR, so it will be interesting to see what effect that has on the speed. The fastest HDDs available now can max out SATA 3 on sequential transfers, but they use dual actuators.