this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
102 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

60704 readers
3941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Does anyone know where this is at? I thought WhatsApp were being forced by the EU in 2024 to introduce this under the Digital Markets App? I'm googling, but am finding very little info.

It would be great if we could use Signal to communicate with WhatsApp groups. The sooner I can delete WhatsApp the better.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

why would anybody move to Signal if they can’t talk to anybody?

why would anybody move to Signal if it's no different in terms of privacy anymore? That'd be the consequence of interoperability.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You'd have better privacy when talking Signal to Signal. Interoperability would be towards those using WhatsApp and then it'd be either using Signal to chat with them or being forced to use WhatsApp's app.

I'm assuming they'd have two different ways to communicate instead of just switching it all to WhatsApp's system.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because more people would be on signal, which means more Signal-to-Signal chats.

As I explained in my post.