642
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
642 points (91.2% liked)
Privacy
32796 readers
1772 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As some who has been out literal in the woods, can someone give me more context?
tl:dr Proton CEO came out on Twitter and praised Trump's selection for FTC leader. Which is fine, in my opinion, even though I disagree with it. What's not so fine is that he followed that up with basically "dems are bought and conservatives are more likely to fight for consumer privacy", which is abundantly clearly to anyone who pays attention to US politics, objectively incorrect.
https://mastodon.neat.computer/@jonah/113705526672291257
The biggest problem to me was the official Proton reddit account making an official statement agreeing with Andy. Andy blamed this on a "miscommunication" and it has since been deleted, but probably only because of the backlash they were receiving.
The biggest problem to me is the CEO of a company whose entire focus is on privacy and privacy advocacy being so incredibly ignorant of US politics as it pertains to privacy.
He actually didn't touch privacy, he touched antitrust and monopolies. The whole benefit to privacy is indirect by means of a level field.
He believes that republicans will do better than dems in terms of fighting big tech monopolies.
You're right, he did, but my point stands regardless.
I thought the whole point stood on "company whose main point is privacy". In this case, his views on antitrust may be naive, but it's quite easy to see how what he thinks might happen with antitrust/big tech is indirectly benefiting the privacy of users (worldwide). So doesn't it fit directly with the opinion of a CEO of a company whose main point is privacy? Ultimately proton didn't change product because of this trump decision, didn't change internal policies, terms, privacy policy, nothing.
Yup, that he is anything but a downgrade from Lina khan for consumer protection in the FTC is super wrong.
*She
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Slater
Protons ceo is publicly promoting trump and so are public proton accounts
That's a lie. He never promoted Trump.
I mean, you're kinda splitting hairs no? He certainly promoted the Republican party, of which Trump leads.
This is also a lie. He did not promote the Republican Party. Words mean something, quit making shit up.
Did you read his actual comments? He literally made propagandistic claims in support of Republicans and in opposition to Democrats. Or do you agree with him that Republicans are "for the little guy"? Its complete nonsense made up to promote the Republican party.
How is saying that republicans are the right choice for their policies and democrats are not, not promoting republicans?
No, I don't think so at all.