this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
39 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

1646 readers
193 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Law passed by Congress forces TikTok to be sold to a U.S. company or banned by Sunday

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just such a bad precedent though.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Bad precedent of banning widely popular apps that do data mining and influence and that are controlled by non friendly dictatorships? If VK was popular in the US, should it get banned, or should we just let it do its things?

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago

Ban the data-mining

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem is saying that it’s bad if it’sa Chinese company but ok if it’s a US company. This is a racist and anti globalist policy.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its not ok when it's an American company, and America has a long way to go on this.

However, enforcement is impossible when China is the one controlling it. There is no limit to what they are allowed to do with the data.

China is banning any Chinese personal data from leaving the country because they are afraid we would handle the data the same way they do foreign data.

Race has nothing to do with it. Dictatorship does. It's bad if any dictatorship or unfriendly country does it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

China also has influence on other platforms. I don't think that's that big on an issue.

The problem is privacy not China

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Who decides what is bad? How is censorship going to get enforced?

This feels like a step closer to state run firewall.

[–] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think the government should get to control what apps, websites, etc.. we can and can't use to communicate with our fellow humans.

Strengthen data privacy laws. Algorithm transparency laws. Look at gdpr and TikTok being sued for sending their data back to China. Etc...