this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
418 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60704 readers
3941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 189 points 5 days ago (5 children)

At this point I’ve been using DDG for 7 years as my main search engine. It’s gotten better while Google has become a joke.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago

Can confirm. I didn't think it'd be like that but it do be like that. DDG gang, where you at.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago

They need to fix the minus syntax/feature. That's my singular complaint.

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I switched to DDG recently due to the manifest v3 changes and AI junk and have been really liking it. It feels like what Google used to be when it was good.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You didn't switch to FF due to the manifest v3 changes? You switched search engines?

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Hah yeah I guess I combined those confusingly. It was both of those things hitting around the same time, I switched to FF and DDG.

[–] dukethorion@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (4 children)

So, you're saying Bing got better.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

DDG does add their own spice on to – or so they claim, and Bing doesn't have bangs so I'd never want to use it.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Personally I just use the better in-browser feature instead of bangs

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fair. I could with Firefox, but I'm too lazy to configure all of that for myself.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fortunately it takes like 2 minutes.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

But doesn't work on mobile

[–] owl@infosec.pub 8 points 4 days ago

DuckDuckGo: The coolest way to use bing and apple maps.
(I do use it though)

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

I don’t know the full story about how Microsoft is developing Bing, but I do know that Google made a conscious decision to make their search results worse, simply so that you’d search more times, which for them translates to additional ad revenue. But, my sense is Bing hasn’t gone this far yet.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

It's not only the results, though, but other features too

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Can't wait until they enshittify, the way I see it, everything will eventually, even Lemmy. It's up to us to not settle too hard in one place

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The fact Lemmy is open source and federated makes it almost impossible to enshittify. What are you gonna do, show ads? Third party clients are first class citizens here

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it still can enshittify, but we can save it with the help of git and the fork button

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Unless corporations start ruling it somehow, it really can't enshittify.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

One scenario is that normies join en masse and influencers/marketers follow them, and the quality of conversation goes to zero like on all big platforms. You can't solve this with software.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 12 points 4 days ago

So that's "getting shittier" but not "enshittification". The latter is explicitly a profit-motive driven phenomenon, coined by Cory Doctorow in 2023. Here's the original post he made about it: https://doctorow.medium.com/tiktoks-enshittification-bb3f5df91979

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That's called eternal September.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's not enshittification. Enshiification doesn't mean "gets shittier".

Enshittification is this very specific thing where services are initially good to attract users, but eventually turn to making things shittier for user in pursuit of profit growth - where they can't really grow the user base any more, so the only way to satisfy wall street's need for exponential growth is to add user-hostile changes to squeeze more out of existing users.

That's not a thing with Lemmy unless it goes corporate somehow.

Edit: missed that someone else already called this out

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They get a large enough audience for disinformation campaigns

Once you see people start defending Russia it’s over

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Once you see people start defending Russia it’s over

If that's what you are looking for, the .ml server has you covered already...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, Lemmy is just a worse version of forums. The federation really hurts it

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No, I don't think that's sustainable, nor is it sustainable to act as if it were true. Given the lack of resources we have compared to Google or Meta et al., the only way to make it work is to stick with something for the long run, and bake in protections in both the technology and the organisational structure. Being opensource and federated goes a long way there, there's no real reason why something not for profit would have to enshittify. But people won't put in the effort to keep building it if they think that's inevitable.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

The core of what you're saying has been my approach for many years. Never go "all in" on anything.

Convenience is one thing (to me, but it's everything to so many), but it's just one factor. And if it means I am (or my data is) the product, it costs too much.